IslamReview

If you have problems adding your message, please send your message to the webmaster.

Rules of posting in this Guestbook:

Posting in this Guestbook is a privilege not a right. We reserve to ourselves the right to exclude any messages we deem to be inappropriate.

This website is a Christian website, but Muslims are allowed to respond, provided they observe the following rules:

They keep their discussions strictly about Islam not other religions.
Muslims are to discuss the issues at hand, not to initiate new issues.
Insults and abusive language are not tolerated.
Messages must be of reasonable length and Guestbook may not be flooded with messages that express the same thought.
URLs (web addresses) are not allowed in messages.

Add a message : Islam Review : Search
There are now 4071 messages in our guestbook.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 408 >>>
Viewing messages 1 to 10.

btilly

islam is a trojan horse in America. They use the freedoms in the west to expand islam. well, americans will fight back and since we all serve the same god, we were the ones who were told to fight until all muslims are subdued. Infidels have a Bible,called the Infidel Holy Text-Our god said do unto muslims before they do unto you! Infidel 1:1

7 May 2008 - ghetto

from Spengler on Quran

Islam can hardly have a doctrine of how to innovate
within a tradition because it began by repudiating
tradition, by an act of radical supersessionism:
instead of accepting prior scripture as valid but
largely superseded, it rejected prior scripture as
corrupt. It rejected innovation from the outset: its
radically conservative "back to Abraham" framework
of self-legitimation indicted existing tradition
for having innovated, and in the process rejected the
very notion of tradition, which is a process of
continuous change within a framework of continuity.

Jews and Christians should prefer to see a Torah
scroll or a Bible burnt rather than have a Jew or a
Christian killed; only were a sacred text so rare
that its destruction would imperil the survival of
the body of faith would loss of life to preserve it
be justified. Muslims, by contrast, are taught to
think martyrdom preferable to the desecration of even
the cheapest machine-printed Qur'an. In the
Judeo-Christian tradition, the Book is not the miracle:
God's love is the miracle, and its primary
manifestation is not in any book but in Israel itself, Old
or New. People can become better than they are by
striving to imitate God: books cannot, and serve only
to help people in that endeavor. However, as Sunni
Islam made clear in rejecting imitatio dei as the
heresy that defines Sufism, the book serves a
different function in Islam: a manual of obedience, of
submission. The Jew or Christian stands upon his
scripture in reaching up to God's love; the Muslim
must remain always below the discipline manual that
conveys Allah's will.

It is not just that Judaism and Christianity have
means to cope with change: their very essence is to
induce change. God's love and our reciprocation of
it, like any love that is not mere self-love,
implies change. It implies becoming better than we are
-- more loving, more just, more knowing, more
powerful, more like God in all His attributes. And that
implies change in how we perceive and apply
scripture. If we read of Joshua's conquests or Temple
sacrifice with moral revulsion, or the Genesis account
of creation with condescension, it is because we
have changed for the better in the past three
millennia, because the Bible has born fruit. If the Muslim
reads the Qur'an with no such feelings, perhaps the
Qur'an has not.

25 April 2008

btilly

Not one Muslim has denied Sura 3:54.
If Muslims say Infidels insult the prophet and Islam well they need insulting. If Allah and Islam and Muhammad can insult everybody else, then they can expect the same.
Islam's milkshake is no better than ours. DRINK UP MUSLIMS. CHOCOLATE, VANILLA, OR STRAWBERRY!

24 April 2008 - ghetto

btilly

we all dont serve the same god. allah is the devil. sura 3:54

23 April 2008 - ghetto

To Matt

Dear Matt,

As I read your post something was missing and by the end I knew what it was. Common sense. . I think to more or less degree we all have looked at other faiths' scriptures and wondered why we can't come to grips with understanding God and the Universe through them.

Well, the very first thing I would recommend to you is to do a study of the history and foundations of each religion first.

Although Hinduism claims to be the oldest and best religion, much of it is based upon Biblical prophets who became Hindu gods, like Abraham (Brahma) and Sarah (Sarasvati) and many rituals and holy scriptures have
exact correlations in the Torah (Tanak).which sorta tells you which came first.

In the same spirit of discovery, study origins of Islam, not Muslims today. Study both pros and cons to get a balanced view. This web site is actually "against" Islam and for very good reason. It is a religion built upon quicksand. It does not hold up under investigation and common sense and espcially historical and scientific and "holy" claims it makes about itself.

If you do not put forth the effort to get to the truth, then you may as well worship a dictionary and consider Mirriam Webster as the true final prophet. Without understanding the background a religion is grounded in, one will simply be a blind follower of any gibberish.

23 April 2008

George H

Paul, you are certainly correct about muslims being destitute, which explains why in this life they worship more fervently a visa to a kufar country than they do even the cheap porn of their koran. Of course, their prophet solved the problem of his destitution by living off a rich woman (his first wife), and then after her death by becoming a thief. His thievery even received allah's divine permission in verse 8:41, which verse reserves 20% of the loot from thievery for the prophet himself.

As far as the pudenda of women are concerned, it seems to be a fixation of muslims every time we kufars say something unkind about their god and (especially) their prophet. Their reponse so often consists of their desire and/or threat to have their way sexually with out daughters, mothers, sisters, cousins, etc. Of course their koran says that rape is OK in verse 4:24, so that attitude should be no surprise to us.

Speaking of pudenda, their prophet had fixations on all sorts of pudenda. Their prophet's sexual proclivities included women, men, children, dead women, animals, and even a watermelon.

As far as the capabilities of women are concerned, muslims would do well to remember that a cow-worshipping Hindu woman (Indira Ghandi) led India to victories in several wars with neighbouring muslim Porkistan. I guess allah is scared of cow worshipping Hindus.

Muslims would also do well to remember that it was tiny Israel, led by a woman (Golda Meir), who repeatedly led the greatly outnumbered Israelis to victories over the muslim arab attackers. I guess allah is scared of Jews too.

22 April 2008 - BC Canada

Paul E. Rantau

George H, you’re right on the money as far as Allah being a racist without equal! He convinces Muslims that they are the best of all societies. He tells Muslims that only Islam is acceptable to him. He shows his extreme prejudice when he revealed the verses that tell Muslmis ‘Jews are decended from monkeys and pigs!’

Of course, in reality the great majority of Muslims are clearly not the best in any sense of the word. Many are backward, superstitious and downright destitute. If Islam is acceptable to Allah because it is the only religion that (1) has been spread by the sword, (2) tells its adherents that killing unbelievers is sanctioned by him, (3) teaches Muslims that women are created to be less intelligent, less spiritual, less reliable, incapable of showing gratitute to men, consequently make up the majority of the denizen of hell and furthermore a woman’s body comprises 10 pudenda - then no one can argue with Allah’s decision.

PAUL

21 April 2008 - Singapore

Matt Tanner | mata19467~AT~yahoo~DOT~de

Dear all,

Just one simple question: what is the point?

In the past I've spent some time reading the Torah, the Gospel and the Qur'an - just out of curiosity, just to get an idea of what people are talking about when they say, "we are right and all the rest are wrong.", when they say, "we are the only ones who understand and are able to interpret the word of God."

The interesting thing is, you can find fault and contradiction in any of these scriptures, and you find just as many
justifications and interpretations that try to correct those faults and contradictions. And the only reason for people to come up with those justifications and interpretations is to still be able to say, "we are right and they are wrong."

Why is it so hard to understand for members of any religion that since those scriptures came into existence they have
been subject to manipulation and corruption.
Believe is one things but religion as an institution is a totally different.
How come that even within one religion people are not even able to agree what's right and wrong or how to interpret
the words in their respective scriptures (e.g. Protestants vs. Roman Catholics). There's a very simple explanation to
that: religion (as an institution) all over the world has nothing to do with Believe in God any longer.
Religion in this sense is only a means of control, taking influence, and in some cases motivating the masses.

Don't you realize that whatever religion you belong to, and whenever you maintain you are "true believers", all the time you disregard and corrupt the word of your ONE GOD?
All existing scriptures are the same in that they cite God saying, "Thou shall not kill." But still we have nothing
better to do than find exuses for killing others and we twist words just as long as it takes for everyone to
believe we are doing something just.

The funny thing is that apparently we all believe in the same ONE GOD. Nevertheless, we find it too hard to accept that this ONE GOD would want us to live peacefully together. Does our ONE GOD want us to be evil? Does our ONE GOD want us to kill each other?

On countless occassions the Jews with what they do contradict the words written in the Torah, on countless occassions the Christians contradict the words of the Gospel, and on countless occassions the Muslims contradict the words of the Qur'an.
And the only mistake they all make is instead of reading their respective scriptures themselves and find their own truth in them, they blindly follow those who want to make them believe that they are the only ones able to tell them what God wanted us to know and to do.
Religion today - as an institution - is hypocritic and highly corrupted. You certainly serve someone's interests
but most certainly not your God's will.

There's just ONE GOD that you can believe in or not. If you do, the message is: live peacefully and with respect for each other together and let your ONE GOD be the judge when it matters.

21 April 2008 - Germany

Webmaster Comments:
But all religions are not equal, and they contradict one another. So they can't ALL lead you to eternal life. In addition, you can't judge a religion by those who claim that they belong to it. The point is that Jesus said that He is the way. He didn't come to establish a religion but grant His life in us. The Christian does not follow a religion but a person.

George H

Actually, allah is the racist, or at the very least allah is a linguistic supremacist, because allah will only receive prayers in Arabic.

I take that to mean that allah is a unilingual retard who needs mere mortals like us to translate for him.

18 April 2008 - BC Canada

The Other Cheek? Not if you're holding a knife!

Dear Farhan Meta,
Please understand that non-Mulsims cannot simply cave in to Islam,,,, after careful review which is presented here. are the reasons others reject Islam. Read the Quran and tell us about purportedly final words given to the final prophet.when will the words end, or change if they are found unaccaptable?
'death to Jews' 'Jews are pigs'.'do not befriend people of the book' "slay them with a sword to the neck where ever you meet them" .Those were Quran and MOhammed's last words to the world (since you believe in the Seal of the Prophets, a rather narrow unforgiving view)
Jesus' final words were "Father forgive them "

Now who is the racist?
Salaam aliakum

15 April 2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 408 >>>